RNCohortJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2019

Trajectory of Physical Functioning Among Persons Living With HIV in Nursing Homes.

Shubing Cai, Susan C Miller, Ira B Wilson

PMID 30846372

WHAT IT FOUND

44% of nursing home residents with HIV improved daily activities within 90 days.

For residents aged 70 or older, reported improvement was 29.3 percentage points with dementia and 40.6 percentage points without dementia.

Key findings

01Forty-four percent of residents with HIV improved in ADL within 90 days of nursing home admission.

02For residents aged 70 or older, the paper reports ADL improvement probabilities of 29.3 percentage points with dementia and 40.6 percentage points without dementia.

03The paper reports a statistically significant difference in ADL improvement between residents with and without dementia only among those aged 70 or older.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only residents who stayed at least 90 days and had at least 2 assessments were included, so shorter stays are not represented. Residents with little or no ADL impairment at admission were excluded, so the findings do not describe residents who start with high function. Residents with a documented prognosis of 6 months or less or hospice enrollment were excluded. HIV identification depended on MDS and Medicaid claims; in 5 states HIV data were not sent to CMS, so only Medicaid-eligible residents could be captured there. The study did not compare residents with HIV to HIV-negative nursing home residents, so it cannot say whether HIV itself changed the ADL trajectory. Some residents may have received physical or occupational therapy at admission, but the study did not measure or control for that. The significance statement for the oldest group labels the comparison in a way that conflicts with the reported probabilities, so the direction of that specific result should be read from the probability values. This was an observational study, so unmeasured differences between residents could explain the pattern.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not include a conflict-of-interest declaration. The publication types indicate NIH extramural research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 44% improvement as proof that nursing home care, HIV care, or therapy caused better function. The study was observational, did not compare residents with HIV to HIV-negative residents, and did not measure which residents received physical or occupational therapy.

Read it on PubMed →