Towards automated risk prediction of persistent pain: Exploring psychosocial factors from electronic health records after breast cancer surgery.
Tanja Liukas, Riitta Rosio, Laura-Maria Peltonen
PMID 36598880WHAT IT FOUND
In 101 breast cancer surgery records, nurses' free-text notes documented resilience, social factors, emotional factors, anxiety, sleep-related factors and depression, but entries were uneven and sometimes absent.
This describes existing documentation, not a tested pain prediction.
Key findings
01In 101 analysed records, psychosocial expressions formed six categories: psychological strength and resilience 39%, social factors 23%, emotional factors 11%, anxiety 11%, sleep-related factors 9%, and depression 7%.
02Some records contained multiple psychosocial expressions, while others contained none.
03Psychological strength and resilience was the most documented category, with expressions about survival, adaptability and trust in treatment.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Records came from one Finnish university hospital, so documentation style and language may not apply elsewhere. Only free-text narratives were analysed, so information recorded only in structured fields was not included. The records were written by healthcare professionals and may not reflect patients' own experiences or thoughts. There was no clear systematic documentation policy, so some factors may have been discussed but not recorded. Anxiety, depression and sleep were not measured systematically in all patients, so the recorded expressions do not show how common these symptoms were. No patient pain outcome was analysed, so the study cannot show which documented factors predicted persistent pain. Only 101 records were analysed after random selection from a larger set, and saturation was used rather than a powered sample.
Declared interests
There was no funding for this work, and the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the category percentages as evidence that these factors caused or predicted persistent pain. This study reviewed existing records and did not test a prediction model or patient outcomes.