PTOTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Timing of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the nondominant primary motor cortex fails to modulate cortical hemodynamic activity and improve motor sequence learning.

Minxia Jin, Xiaomeng Xu, Ziwei Zhang and 3 others

PMID 39891195

WHAT IT FOUND

Stimulating the brain before or during a finger-tapping task made no difference to learning or brain activity in healthy older adults.

Neither timing improved performance over sham stimulation, and no change in blood oxygen levels was detected.

Key findings

01There was no significant difference in motor sequence learning between concurrent stimulation, prior stimulation, and sham stimulation.

02High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation did not significantly alter cortical hemodynamic activity compared to sham, regardless of timing.

03Participants' guesses about whether they received active or sham stimulation were evenly distributed, confirming that blinding was successful.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 20 healthy adults, which may limit the generalizability of the null findings to clinical populations such as stroke survivors. The interventionist was not blinded to the stimulation condition, although the interventionist did not manage the device settings directly. The fNIRS system lacked short separation channels, meaning the measured brain activity could have been contaminated by changes in blood flow in the scalp caused by the stimulation electrodes. The stimulation intensity was low (1 mA), and it is unclear if higher intensities or multiple sessions would produce different results.

Declared interests

The study was funded by several Shanghai municipal and national health and science programs. No commercial conflicts of interest were reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that tDCS is ineffective for all motor learning or in all populations. This null result applies specifically to a single session of low-intensity stimulation in healthy older adults; the authors note that larger trials and different parameters are needed before ruling out benefits in other contexts.

Read it on PubMed →