RNRCTResearch in nursing & health2017

Timing for the Introduction of Cycled Light for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Debra H Brandon, Susan G Silva, Jinhee Park and 3 others

PMID 28431191

WHAT IT FOUND

Starting cycled light at 28 weeks instead of 36 made no significant difference in weight gain or hospital stay for extremely preterm infants.

The early group left about 5 days sooner, but this was not a proven effect.

Key findings

01Early versus late cycled light did not significantly change weight gain during hospitalization.

02Length of stay was not significantly different, though the early-light group went home 5.5 days sooner on average.

03The study was underpowered because observed effects were smaller than expected.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was underpowered to detect small differences because the actual effects were smaller than expected. Attrition in the outpatient follow-up data limited the certainty of long-term outcomes. Unmeasured differences between the three step-down nurseries might have influenced the results.

Declared interests

The authors have no financial relationships to disclose and no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that early cycled light shortens hospital stays. The 5.5-day difference was not statistically significant, and the study was underpowered to detect small effects.

Read it on PubMed →