PTOTQualitativePhysical therapy2021

Therapeutic Alliance: Patients' Expectations Before and Experiences After Physical Therapy for Low Back Pain-A Qualitative Study With 6-Month Follow-Up.

Monica Unsgaard-Tøndel, Sylvia Søderstrøm

PMID 34339506

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients expected exercises and a specific diagnosis but valued reassurance and active listening most.

Trusting the therapist and understanding pain was not dangerous helped them manage symptoms and return to activity. This describes patient experience, not proof that these interactions cause recovery.

Key findings

01All participants expected physical therapy to involve exercises and to help them get better, with most expecting the therapist to identify a specific muscular cause or diagnosis.

02After treatment, patients shifted focus to relational factors, with 8 of 11 identifying the therapist's ability to reassure them that their pain was not dangerous as crucial for improved function.

03Patients described learning about their body and receiving tailored self-management advice as empowering, which helped them regain control over everyday activity and physical function.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was very small (13 participants) and recruited from a specific subgroup of patients already involved in a larger quantitative study, so it may not represent all people with low back pain. The study describes patient experiences and perceptions. It does not measure clinical outcomes like pain scores or disability indices, so it cannot prove that these relational factors cause physical improvement. Dropout occurred over time, with only 8 participants completing all three interviews, which limits the view of long-term experiences. The researchers were physical therapists, and they acknowledged their own clinical background influenced how they interpreted the data on trust and therapeutic alliance.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that reassurance and active listening are proven treatments that reduce pain or disability. This study reports what patients said was important to them, not objective evidence that these interactions caused their recovery. It is a description of the patient experience, not a test of efficacy.

Read it on PubMed →