PTPilotInternational journal of sports physical therapy2021

The Test Re-Test Reliability of A Novel Single Leg Hop Test (T-Drill Hop Test).

Rodney Negrete, Samantha Simms, Jacob Gross and 5 others

PMID 34123525

WHAT IT FOUND

The T-Drill Hop Test showed excellent consistency when healthy young adults repeated it days apart.

It also revealed no time difference between dominant and non-dominant legs in this healthy group, establishing a baseline before testing injured athletes.

Key findings

01The test demonstrated excellent reliability, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranging between 0.98 and 1.00.

02There was no significant difference in completion times between the dominant and non-dominant legs in healthy participants.

03The study population consisted entirely of healthy, recreationally active college-aged individuals, not patients or competitive athletes.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only healthy, non-patient college-aged subjects, so the results do not apply to injured athletes or older populations. The sample had an uneven mix of men and women, and gender differences in hopping performance were noted as a potential confounding factor. No competitive athletes were included, limiting the relevance to high-performance return-to-sport decisions. The study established reliability but did not test validity or compare the T-Drill Hop Test to existing standard hop tests.

Declared interests

The author has no conflict of interest to report.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use the completion times or limb symmetry data from this study to make return-to-sport decisions for injured patients. The data comes from healthy, recreationally active college students, not individuals with lower extremity injuries, so these values are not clinical benchmarks.

Read it on PubMed →