RNSystematic ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2018

The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: A systematic review.

Holly Wei, Kerry A Sewell, Gina Woody and 1 others

PMID 31406839

WHAT IT FOUND

Hospitals with healthier nurse work environments and Magnet designation see lower patient mortality, fewer pressure ulcers, and better cardiac arrest survival.

Staffing ratios and leadership quality are critical drivers of these patient safety outcomes.

Key findings

01Patients in hospitals with poor work environments had a 16% lower chance of surviving in-hospital cardiac arrests compared to those in hospitals with respectable environments.

02Units within Magnet-designated hospitals had a 21% lower likelihood of developing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers than units in non-Magnet hospitals.

03In hospitals with the best nurse staffing, healthier environments decreased the odds of patient deaths and failure-to-rescue by 12% and 14% respectively.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review is restricted to studies conducted in the United States, which may not apply to healthcare systems in other countries. Most included studies were descriptive or correlational, meaning they show associations but cannot prove that improving the work environment directly causes better patient outcomes. The definition of 'healthy work environment' varied across the 54 studies, using different instruments and conceptual models.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The research did not receive specific grant funding from public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that changing the work environment alone will fix patient outcomes. The data shows that staffing ratios and work environment quality interact; improving staffing had no effect in hospitals with poor work environments, and the greatest benefit was seen only when both were optimized.

Read it on PubMed →