OTSurveyNeuropsychological rehabilitation2020

The smartphone in the memory clinic: A study of patient and care partner's utilisation habits.

Jared F Benge, Kara L Dinh, Erin Logue and 3 others

PMID 29661059

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients and care partners in a memory clinic often use smartphones daily, but mainly for email and general features.

They use built-in reminders, calendars, alarms and voice features less often, so these aids are not yet common.

Key findings

01Of 53 patients, 90.6% owned a mobile phone and 75.4% described their phone as a smartphone; of 44 care partners, 100% owned a mobile phone and 90.9% described their device as a smartphone.

02Across patients, care partners and older controls, participants reported using smartphone cognitive aide features less commonly than social or general features.

03Care partners reported using cognitive aide features more often than the older AMT control group, and 55% reported using their smartphone to help with caregiving.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was a convenience sample of predominantly white individuals, so the rates may not apply to other populations. Smartphone use was self-reported, so it may differ from actual phone use, and memory deficits could affect recall. The patient group mixed people with no cognitive impairment, dementia, movement disorders and other diagnoses, so it is unclear which specific patients would benefit. The online control group was recruited later, was not as old as the patient group, and may be more technologically savvy, so it is not a tightly matched comparison. The study did not test whether training patients to use smartphone cognitive aids improves memory, daily function, or caregiver burden. Refusal rates were not tracked, and non-smartphone owners were omitted from feature analyses, so the findings describe only smartphone owners. The cross-sectional design cannot separate age-related decline from cohort effects.

Declared interests

Microsoft Research donated phones for a later intervention study of smartphones in older adults. That later study was not the focus of this paper, and the donation occurred after data collection. The authors reported no other conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that smartphone cognitive aids improve memory or daily function. The paper measured self-reported smartphone use in a convenience sample and did not test an intervention or patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
100 clinical participants were recruited; one survey was excluded because results were incomprehensible, and two other surveys were excluded because patient or care partner status was unclear. The ownership analyses reported 53 patients, 44 care partners and 204 AMT respondents.
Certainty of evidence
Low

More in geriatrics

Browse

Cite

Jared F Benge, Kara L Dinh, Erin Logue, et al. The smartphone in the memory clinic: A study of patient and care partner's utilisation habits. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. 2020.

Read the original