SLPOtherLanguage and speech2026

The Role of Phonological Factors in the Processing of Polish Phonotactics.

Paula Orzechowska, Andrzej Porębski, Marta Nowak

PMID 40879495

WHAT IT FOUND

Polish adults judged made-up words more possible when final consonant pairs followed Polish sound rules and existed in Polish.

Vowel type also mattered: /a/ and /ɛ/ increased acceptance, while /ɔ/ was judged fastest but accepted least often.

Key findings

01Speakers accepted made-up words more often when the final consonant pair obeyed Polish sonority rules and was already found in Polish.

02Vowel quality changed acceptability: /a/ and /ɛ/ increased the chance of a 'possible' response compared with /ɔ/.

03Participants took longest to judge words ending in non-existent well-formed pairs, and words with /a/ took longer than words with /ɔ/.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study tested only adult native speakers of Polish in a laboratory word-judgment task, so it does not show how children or other language users would process sound sequences. The study tested only word-final consonant pairs, so it does not address word-initial consonant pairs. The paper states that findings from monosyllables cannot be generalized to rhyme structure because the stimuli were not controlled for rhymes. The authors note that the role of sonority depends on the task and should be interpreted only for the specific judgment task used here. The sample was 41 university students, mostly from one region, so the findings may not represent all Polish speakers.

Declared interests

The research was financed by the National Science Center, Poland. The paper does not report a commercial sponsor.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these lab findings as evidence about clinical assessment or treatment. The study tested adult native speakers judging made-up words, not patients or therapy outcomes.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →