RNSurveyScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025

The Relationship Between Staff and Patient Interactions and Patients' Perceptions of Good Quality of Care in Psychiatric Outpatient Services-A Structural Equation Model.

Mikael Rask, Patrik Rytterström, Tabita Sellin and 3 others

PMID 40457514

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients who felt staff showed interest in their feelings rated care as more empowering, especially when staff invited a relationship and gave clear information.

These are associations, not proof of cause.

Key findings

01Patients rated staff inviting a relationship as the most common interaction, and Encounter as a high-rated dimension of care.

02Staff showing interest in feelings, experiences and behaviour was linked to inviting a relationship, helping, encounter, support and information, which together were linked to perceived empowerment.

03Encounter and Participation/Information were the only aspects with direct links to perceived empowerment, while Helping had weaker links.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study measured patients' perceptions, not what staff actually did, so it cannot show that staff behaviour caused better care. The analysis was exploratory and removed non-significant dimensions to improve model fit, so the final model may reflect the chosen variables more than all aspects of care. People who declined participation were not counted, so the results may not represent all patients attending psychiatric outpatient clinics. The sample excluded people with dementia, confusion or who were judged unable to participate, and required Swedish literacy, so it does not apply to all outpatient psychiatric patients. Staff were a mixed group of healthcare professions, so the findings are not specific to nurses or any one discipline. Missing questionnaire data were imputed using each participant's own mean item value for dimensions with 30% or fewer missing items, which may make responses look more consistent. Diagnoses were self-reported, and 174 patients did not report a diagnosis.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, and the article is listed as research supported by non-U.S. government sources.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the model as showing that staff showing interest causes better care. The study was cross-sectional and exploratory, so it can only describe associations among patient ratings.

Read it on PubMed →