PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2017

The ratio of medial and lateral hamstring muscle thickness does not correlate with the lateral tibial rotation angle in the standing position in healthy young adults.

Dong-Soo Lee, Sung-Dae Choung, Seung-Won Lee and 2 others

PMID 28533596

WHAT IT FOUND

In 30 healthy young men, ultrasound ratios of hamstring muscle thickness did not correlate with tibial rotation angle while standing.

This resting thickness ratio alone may not explain standing tibial rotation.

Key findings

01The ratios of lateral to medial hamstring muscle thickness did not correlate with tibial torsion angle on either side while standing.

02The study measured healthy young men only in a static standing position, not during knee flexion or dynamic movement.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 30 male university students were studied, and they had no reported lower-limb orthopedic, surgical, drug, or neurological problems, so the results may not apply to women, older adults, or people with lower-limb problems. Measurements were made only in a static standing position, not during knee flexion, walking, or other movement, so they may not reflect dynamic knee control. The study looked for correlation, not whether changing hamstring thickness changes tibial rotation. The paper notes many structures may influence tibial torsion angle, including bone shape, ligaments, meniscus, ankle or pelvic alignment, and muscles that cross two joints, so hamstring thickness alone may be too narrow.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that hamstring thickness ratios explain standing tibial rotation or that changing them will change rotation. This was a small static correlation study in healthy young men, and the paper's written result is no correlation.

Read it on PubMed →