RNCohortThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2024

The Quality of Dying in Frail Institutionalized Older Patients After Nonoperative and Operative Management of a Proximal Femoral Fracture: An In-Depth Analysis.

Sverre A I Loggers, Romke Van Balen, Hanna C Willems and 9 others

PMID 37403839

WHAT IT FOUND

Overall proxy-rated quality of dying looked similar after nonoperative and operative proximal femoral fracture care.

Symptom control, especially pain, was lowest, so comfort assessment needs close attention.

Key findings

01Overall proxy-rated quality of dying and its symptom control, preparation, connectedness, and transcendence subdomains did not differ between nonoperative and operative management.

02Symptom control was the lowest-rated domain, and pain was controlled none to some of the time in 36% of nonoperative patients and 29% of operative patients.

03Median time to death was 7.0 days in the nonoperative group and 25.0 days in the operative group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only patients who died and whose proxies answered the questionnaire were analysed, so the results apply to decedents, not to all patients with proximal femoral fracture. The final analysis included 53 nonoperative proxies and 21 operative proxies, and the study was not primarily powered to detect differences in quality of dying. Proxy response rates were 64% in the nonoperative group and 53% in the operative group, which may have introduced selection bias. Quality of dying was reported by proxies after death, not by patients themselves, and limited proxy characteristics were collected. Treatment was chosen through shared decision making, and the small sample did not allow adjustment for multiple possible confounders.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was supported by ZonMw and the Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that nonoperative management is better or worse for quality of dying. The treatment choice was made through shared decision making, only patients who died and had proxy responses were analysed, and the study was not powered to detect differences in quality of dying.

Read it on PubMed →