The Integration of Emotional, Physiologic, and Communication Responses to Medical Oncology Surveillance Appointments During Breast Cancer Survivorship.
Margaret F Clayton, Catherine Dingley, Gary Donaldson
PMID 27088607WHAT IT FOUND
Breast cancer survivors felt less uncertain and anxious after a routine oncology visit, but immune changes were inconsistent.
Nurses can ask about fear of recurrence and explain symptoms rather than assume distress is absent.
Key findings
01After a routine medical oncology surveillance visit, women reported decreased uncertainty and state anxiety.
02Natural killer cells increased in 70% of women after the visit, but other immune markers changed inconsistently.
03Greater fear of cancer recurrence was associated with increased change in interleukin levels after the visit.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 27 women were studied, all recurrence-free and at least two years after treatment, so the findings may not apply to men, newly treated patients, or women with different survivorship concerns. One post-visit immune sample was not suitable for testing, and missing self-report values were replaced with the mean. Data were collected only immediately before the visit and the next morning, so the study could not establish baseline immune values, when immune changes began, or when they returned to usual levels. The study was exploratory, used significance at .10, and immune markers have normal variability. Associations are tentative. Participants had long-standing provider relationships and adequate veins, and women taking anti-inflammatory medications were excluded, which may limit generalizability.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the post-visit rise in natural killer cells in 70% of women as proof that surveillance visits improve immunity. The sample was small, immune changes were inconsistent, and the study did not test an intervention.