OTOtherJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

The Influence of a Health Promotion Program on Health and Paid Employment Among Long-Term Non-employed Individuals in the Netherlands.

Roos W Hijdra, Marike van Kalken, Stijn de Zeeuw and 3 others

PMID 40343552

WHAT IT FOUND

The Exercise Works health promotion program did not improve physical health, mental health, work ability, or paid employment more than usual employment services over 12 months.

Participants and coaches still liked it.

Key findings

01Exercise Works participants improved over 12 months in employment participation, work ability, physical health and mental health, but these improvements did not differ significantly from the control group.

02The control group showed mixed results: employment participation increased steadily, while physical and mental health increased before the second questionnaire and decreased thereafter.

03Interviews found participants and coaches were very positive about Exercise Works. They valued playful physical activity, accessible lifestyle education, social contact, and group influence on willingness to try activities.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was not randomised. Exercise Works participants were referred by employment professionals, while control participants were recruited through employment professionals, waiting rooms, and Facebook groups. Eligibility was broadened from social assistance recipients to non-employed people living in the Netherlands because of low enrollment. Many participants did not complete follow-up. Only 64 Exercise Works participants and 61 control participants completed the 12-month questionnaire. The two groups differed at baseline, including age, birthplace, children, and education. Exercise Works combined physical exercise, lifestyle education, and individual coaching, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The control group received usual employment services and may also have participated in other re-employment programs. Interviews included only 11 coaches, 20 participants, and 10 employment professionals, and social desirability or selection bias may have affected the positive perceptions. COVID-19 affected recruitment, program delivery, and participant wellbeing, and contributed to reduced study power.

Declared interests

The paper states the funder was ZonMw. No other conflict of interest or author declaration is provided in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the within-program improvements in health, work ability, and employment as proof that Exercise Works works. The changes were not significantly different from the control group, and the program combined physical activity, lifestyle education, and coaching, so no single component can be credited.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →