Narrative ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective.

Jennifer Olsen, Shruti Turner, Alix Chadwell, Alex Dickinson, Chantel Ostler, Lucy Armitage, Alison H McGregor, Sigrid Dupan, Sarah Day

PMID 36189046

WHAT IT FOUND

This article is an opinion piece arguing that the lack of standardized documentation for prosthetic socket design and manufacturing hinders research reproducibility and patient safety.

It proposes future guidelines but reports no patient data or clinical outcomes.

What this paper is

This is an opinion piece written by a group of biomedical engineering researchers and clinicians. It discusses the lack of standardized documentation for prosthetic socket design and manufacturing, arguing that this gap hinders research reproducibility and patient safety. The article proposes recommendations for future reporting guidelines and outcome measures but contains no original patient data, no methods, and no results. Therefore, there are no clinical findings to act on.

Declared interests

The work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the Scar Free Foundation. The authors declared no commercial or financial conflicts of interest.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Jennifer Olsen, Shruti Turner, Alix Chadwell, et al. The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. 2022.

    Read the original