RNCohortJournal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc2025

The Impact of Adversity and Family Conflict on Risk for Future Substance Use Among Young Adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study): A Cohort Analysis.

Sarah M Rodrigues, Afsaneh Saghafi, Qiao Wang and 5 others

PMID 40265644

WHAT IT FOUND

Higher childhood adversity scores at ages 9 to 10 were linked to higher risk for future alcohol, cigarette/e-cigarette, and marijuana use at ages 12 to 13.

Family conflict did not change that link.

Key findings

01After adjustment, higher baseline ACEs scores were significantly associated with higher risk for future alcohol, cigarette/e-cigarette, and marijuana use at Y3.

02Neither adolescent-reported nor parent-reported family conflict at baseline moderated the positive association between ACEs score and future substance-use risk.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The outcome was self-reported risk for future substance use, not actual substance use or substance use disorder. Data were self-reported and can be affected by recall and social desirability bias. ACEs were coded from baseline items only, so family criminal justice involvement and racial discrimination were not included. The sample may not be nationally representative because rural families were under-recruited and families with higher education and income were overrepresented. Low variability in risk scores and young age may have reduced the chance of detecting a family conflict moderation effect. Y3 data collection overlapped with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, when reported substance use decreased. Complete case analysis and prorating may introduce bias if missing data were not missing at random. The analysis treated each ACE category as contributing equally, which may not reflect different types, timing, or chronicity.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding is not reported in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these findings as proof that adversity causes later substance use or that reducing family conflict will lower risk. The study is observational, measured risk rather than actual use, and family conflict did not moderate the association.

Read it on PubMed →