RNQualitativeNursing open2026

The Experiences and Perspective of Partners of Men With Prostate Cancer in Ireland: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Seidu Mumuni, Claire O'Donnell, Owen Doody

PMID 42083831

WHAT IT FOUND

Partners of men with prostate cancer in Ireland felt overlooked, unprepared for caregiving, silent about sex and distress, and exhausted.

LGBTQ+ partners said staff often misread their relationship. Support was rarely aimed at the couple.

Key findings

01Partners felt healthcare attention focused on the patient, leaving their own emotional needs unseen, and LGBTQ+ partners often had to correct staff about their relationship.

02Partners described little or no prior understanding of prostate cancer and its treatment, which left them overwhelmed and unprepared for post-treatment realities.

03Partners often avoided talking about sexual changes and distress to protect their partner, while caregiving strain led to neglect of self-care and exhaustion.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only nine partners were interviewed, all in Ireland, so the findings cannot be taken as representative of all prostate cancer couples or other health systems. Participants were self-selected through support networks and likely more comfortable discussing relationship and intimacy issues; couples with high conflict, emotional distance, or relationship strain may be missing. The study reports experiences, not measured effects, so it cannot show that any service model, communication approach, or support programme works. Interviews were conducted by phone, video, or face-to-face, which may have changed how much participants shared. Self-report and sensitive topics may have involved recall or social desirability bias. The researchers had nursing backgrounds, and although they used reflexivity, peer debriefing, and member checking, their professional perspective may have shaped interpretation.

Declared interests

The authors reported nothing to disclose and declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as evidence that couple-centred support, nurse-led education, or inclusive communication improves prostate cancer care. The study interviewed nine self-selected partners in Ireland and reports their experiences, not tested effects.

Read it on PubMed →