The Effects of the 2020 COVID-19 Lockdown on Mood, Behavior, and Social and Cognitive Functioning in Older Long-Term Care Residents.
Milou J Angevaare, Karlijn J Joling, Martin Smalbrugge and 3 others
PMID 35964663WHAT IT FOUND
During the Dutch lockdown, long-term care residents did not show clinically relevant group-level worsening in mood, behavior, loneliness, cognition or delirium.
Only self-reported mood symptoms rose slightly, not judged clinically relevant, and staff saw large individual variation.
Key findings
01Self-reported mood symptoms rose 0.33 points more in the lockdown group than the control group on a 0-6 scale.
02Apart from self-reported mood, changes did not significantly differ between groups for observer-reported mood, cognition, withdrawal, aggressive behavior, loneliness, conflict with others or staff, and delirium.
03Staff described large individual variation, including residents with severe cognitive impairment appearing less agitated in quieter shared living rooms.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was an observational historically controlled comparison, not a randomised study, so it cannot prove what the lockdown caused. The routine interRAI assessments may not have captured all effects, and staff suggested more extensive conversations with residents would be needed. Self-reported mood analyses included only residents who could or would answer; about 18% of assessments had missing self-reported mood data. The lockdown period was March 20, 2020, to May 25, 2020, and the second half group had at least 34 days exposure; the authors noted the short duration could limit detection. The focus group participants were staff, not residents or families, so their reflections do not directly report resident experiences. Many subgroup analyses were exploratory, so some significant subgroup findings may be chance. The time between assessments differed slightly between groups (mean 179.2 days for the lockdown group and 174.9 days for the control group), although analyses adjusted for it.
Declared interests
No funding or conflict-of-interest declaration is included in the supplied article text; the publication types note non-U.S. government research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the lockdown was harmless for residents. The study showed no clinically relevant group-level worsening, but it was observational, used routine assessments that may miss effects, and staff reported large individual variation with some residents clearly affected.