PTRCTJournal of physical therapy science2025

The effects of psychologically informed physical therapy on kinesiophobia, pain, disability, depression, and anxiety in patients with chronic low back pain: an intervention study focusing on graded exposure.

Jin-Woo Kang, Yi-Heng Zhang, Young-Sam Yuk and 1 others

PMID 41209594

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding psychologically informed physical therapy to standard therapy lowered pain and depression in patients with chronic low back pain, but fear and disability did not show a between-group difference, and anxiety did not improve.

Key findings

01Pain scores fell significantly in the group receiving standard therapy plus psychologically informed physical therapy, from 4.44 to 2.33, and the between-group difference was significant.

02Depression scores fell significantly in the group receiving standard therapy plus psychologically informed physical therapy, from 21.33 to 13.33, and the between-group difference was significant.

03Fear and disability scores decreased within the psychologically informed physical therapy group, but between-group differences were not significant, and anxiety did not change significantly.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 19 patients were studied, with 10 in the control group and 9 in the experimental group, so the results are too small to be treated as a reliable treatment effect. The intervention lasted only two weeks, and follow-up was only after the two-week period, so long-term effects were not measured. The experimental group received several treatments together: thermal therapy, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, conversational psychologically informed physical therapy, and graded exposure. The paper says the individual contributions of psychologically informed physical therapy and graded exposure cannot be separated. The groups were not identical at baseline. For example, depression scores were 34.30 in the control group and 21.33 in the experimental group, which can make change scores harder to compare. No blinding is described.

Declared interests

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that graded exposure alone caused the pain and depression improvements. The experimental group also received thermal therapy, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and conversational psychologically informed physical therapy, and the paper says the individual contributions of psychologically informed physical therapy and graded exposure cannot be separated.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →