The effectiveness of a tailored programme to promote reproductive-health-promoting behaviour in young women based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model: A randomized controlled trial.
Inhae Cho, Young-Joo Park
PMID 36303303WHAT IT FOUND
Young women's contraception use did not differ from controls after a tailored 8-week reproductive health programme, but self-reported reproductive-health-promoting behaviour scores rose more than in controls.
Key findings
01Self-reported reproductive-health-promoting behaviour scores changed more over time in the intervention group than in the control group.
02Contraception use did not differ significantly between groups.
03Belief, motivation and self-efficacy scores changed more over time than control, but knowledge scores did not show a significant difference.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 59 participants were analysed, with 8 and 5 in intervention Stages 2 and 3 and 7 and 4 in control Stages 2 and 3, so findings for Stages 2 and 3 are limited. The programme bundled seminars, periodic messages, Q&A, practical training, tailored information, videos and counselling, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Participants and data analysts were not blinded, and all outcomes were self-reported online questionnaires. Follow-up was only 8 weeks, so long-term behaviour and persistence were not tested. The analysis included 30 intervention and 29 control participants, not all 60 assigned. Contraception use was measured over a short period and may not reflect actual behaviour. Recruitment was through convenience sampling from university notice boards in Seoul. Mean age differed slightly between groups at baseline (23.00 versus 22.03 years). The control group received educational material once.
Declared interests
The study was supported by the Health Fellowship Foundation in Korea, and the funding source was not involved in the research or article preparation. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that this programme increases contraception use. The rate of contraception use did not differ significantly between groups (Z = -0.47, p = .641), and the significant finding was for self-reported reproductive-health-promoting behaviour, not confirmed contraceptive behaviour.