RNRCTInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2024

The Effect of Group Counselling based on Constructive Couple Communication on Perceived Spousal Support in Uterine and Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Control Trial.

Fatemeh Azimi, Fatemeh Moghaddam-Tabrizi, Rahim Sharafkhani

PMID 39161859

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding five weekly couple communication counselling sessions to routine care increased women's reported spousal support after uterine and cervical cancer one week later.

Informational, instrumental and emotional support rose, and negative support fell, versus routine care alone.

Key findings

01The counselling group had significant increases in informational support (dimension mean 1.60 to 3.45), instrumental support (dimension mean 2.15 to 3.15), emotional support (dimension mean 15.85 to 19.40) and a significant decrease in negative support (dimension mean 5.95 to 2.70).

02The control group did not have significant changes in any support dimension (P>0.05).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was small and conducted in two hospitals in Urmia, with 40 married women in Iran who could read and write, had stage I, II or III cancer, were receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and had no psychiatric history or antidepressant use, so it may not apply to other patients or settings. Follow-up was only one week after the intervention, so it does not show whether the change in perceived support lasted. The outcome was self-reported perceived spousal support, not observed spousal behaviour, marital satisfaction, sexual function, distress or cancer outcomes. The counselling programme combined several elements, including group sessions, videos, images, booklets, optional individual counselling and psychiatrist guidance, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Husband attendance was based on the women's request and was not standardised, so the effect of the couple component alone is unclear. The paper does not describe blinding of participants or outcome assessors, and expectations may have influenced self-reported scores. Sexual issues were considered taboo, and couples refused to discuss them in the group, so the programme may not address all communication problems in this population. The sample size was estimated from a pilot of 20 women, so the precision of the main trial is limited.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report funding or conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that a brief communication talk will improve spousal support. This trial used five weekly group counselling sessions plus routine cancer care, with optional husband attendance, optional individual counselling, psychiatrist guidance, videos, booklets and images, and the outcome was self-reported support measured one week after the programme in 40 married women in Iran.

Read it on PubMed →