RNOtherInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2026

The Effect of a Peer-Led Non-Pharmacological Pain-Management Program on Chronic Pain Intensity and Pain-Related Self-Efficacy in Older Adults with Osteoarthritis: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Maryam Salehian, Samira Mohajer, Marjan Shoghi and 2 others

PMID 42483322

WHAT IT FOUND

Pain intensity did not clearly decrease in the peer-led group, but pain self-efficacy scores rose from 36.99 to 54.45 on a 0-60 scale at two months.

Key findings

01Pain-related self-efficacy scores (0 to 60) rose from 36.99 to 54.45 in the intervention group two months after the program (P<0.001).

02Total pain scores (0 to 77) did not change significantly in the intervention group, moving from 50.71 to 48.55 (P=0.259).

03At two months, total pain scores differed significantly between groups (P<0.001), but the control group had no significant change over time (P>0.05).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were assigned by which healthcare center they attended, not randomly, so baseline differences or center effects could explain some results. Participants and peer educators knew which group received the program, and outcomes were self-reported, so expectations may have influenced scores. Follow-up was short, so the study does not show whether effects last. The study measured pain intensity and self-efficacy only; it did not measure physical function, daily activity performance, or medication use, so it cannot show whether patients moved better or used less medication. The program used trained peers with research-team supervision, so it may not translate directly to settings without that support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the peer-led program reduced pain intensity. In the intervention group, total pain did not change significantly (P=0.259). The significant difference compared with usual care at two months occurred despite no significant change in the control group over time.

Read it on PubMed →