The effect of a combined exercise program on different surfaces on gastrocnemius muscle activation in young athletes.
Ahmet Kurtoğlu, Bekir Çar, Rukiye Çiftçi and 6 others
PMID 41299725WHAT IT FOUND
Four weeks of sprint and plyometric drills increased gastrocnemius muscle activation in young runners on both sand and tartan surfaces.
Tartan training produced greater activation changes on the right leg, while sand produced greater changes on the left leg. No single surface proved superior overall.
Key findings
01Gastrocnemius muscle activation increased after four weeks of training on both surfaces, with no consistent superiority of sand over tartan.
02For the right leg, tartan training produced a significantly greater increase in average muscle activation than sand training.
03For the left leg, sand training produced significant increases in average activation, inter-quartile range, peak activation, and power, but there was no significant difference between surfaces.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study did not record which leg was dominant for each athlete, and the results showed different legs responding to different surfaces, making it impossible to know if the findings reflect a true surface effect or an artifact of leg dominance. The exercises were part of the athletes' existing annual training program with only the surface changed, so the results do not show what would happen with exercises specifically designed to target the gastrocnemius. sEMG was recorded only from the medial head of the gastrocnemius; the lateral head was not measured. No clinical trial registration number was obtained. sEMG amplitude changes do not necessarily correspond to functional performance improvements such as faster sprint times or higher jumps. Individual trajectories showed substantial variation, with some athletes not responding at all, meaning group averages may not predict what will happen for a given patient.
Declared interests
The paper does not report any funding sources or conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that training on sand is superior to training on a hard surface for improving gastrocnemius activation. The interaction effect favoring tartan was limited to the right leg's average activation, and the sand group's improvements on the left leg were not significantly different from the tartan group's. The authors themselves note that activation developed similarly on both surfaces overall.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →