PTOtherInternational journal of sports physical therapy2021

The Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Screen: A Validation Study.

Phillip J Plisky, Garrett S Bullock, Mary Beth Garner and 5 others

PMID 33842026

WHAT IT FOUND

In 37 healthy college students, a standing lunge ankle screen agreed between trained physical therapists and separated behind from beyond categories, which corresponded to 41.3 and 51.8 degrees of measured ankle motion.

It is not evidence the screen predicts injury.

Key findings

01Seven physical therapists scored the standing ankle dorsiflexion screen with agreement from 86 to 94 percent.

02The screen placed the back knee as behind, within, or beyond the front medial malleolus.

03Behind and beyond screen categories were linked to modified lunge measurements of 41.3 degrees and 51.8 degrees.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Thirty-seven ambulatory university students were tested, all injury-free at the time of testing, so the findings may not apply to older patients or injured athletes. The screen was scored by trained physical therapists after instruction by someone who helped develop the screen, so agreement may not transfer to clinicians without that training. The study tested agreement and category separation, not whether the screen predicts injury; the authors call for prospective studies to determine injury risk identification ability. The behind category mean was 41.3 degrees, which the authors noted was higher than expected, so category cut-points may not match clinical expectations. The authors note participants could have had chronic ankle instability, Achilles tendinopathy, or plantar fasciitis despite being injury-free at testing.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this screen predicts ankle sprain risk. It was tested only for agreement between raters and for separating behind and beyond categories in 37 injury-free college students, and the authors call for prospective studies to determine injury risk identification ability.

Read it on PubMed →