The distribution of autistic traits across the autism spectrum: evidence for discontinuous dimensional subpopulations underlying the autism continuum.
Ahmad Abu-Akel, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron-Cohen and 1 others
PMID 31149329WHAT IT FOUND
Adult autism trait scores did not split into a clear line.
The score separating groups changed by sex and by sample makeup. Do not treat a questionnaire cutoff as a fixed diagnostic rule.
Key findings
01The two distributions intersected between 30 and 32 on the AQ scale in the enriched sample.
02The estimated AQ cutoff was 31.96 in the female-only sample and 30.16 in the male-only sample.
03In the prevalence-true resampled analysis, the estimated cutoff was 34.18, higher than the enriched-sample mean cutoff of 31.53.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was collected online as a convenience sample, so it may not represent all autistic or neurotypical adults. Autism diagnoses were self-reported and not clinically verified. Some people in the neurotypical group may have been clinically autistic but undiagnosed. Only the AQ was used, so the result depends on a self-report measure. Females were overrepresented in both the autistic and neurotypical groups. The enriched sample had far more autistic people than the general population, so its cutoff may not apply to a general population. The prevalence-true sample was created by resampling the enriched data, not by recruiting a population sample. The model was limited to two components, so it may not capture all subgroups. The authors state that the findings should not be used to choose a fixed cutoff.
Declared interests
The article lists funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative. No other conflict-of-interest statement is included in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not use these AQ cutoff scores as diagnostic thresholds. The study did not evaluate diagnostic properties, diagnoses were self-reported, and the cutoff changed with sex and sample prevalence.