RNSystematic ReviewCancer nursing2024

The Barriers and Enablers to Participation in Oncology Clinical Trials for Ethnically Diverse Communities: A Qualitative Systematic Review Using Metaethnography.

Lorraine Turner, Sally Taylor, Ashleigh Ward and 2 others

PMID 40106657

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients and clinicians disagreed on why ethnic minorities avoid cancer trials.

Patients cited mistrust, family influence, and cost. Clinicians blamed patient reluctance and time pressures, often overlooking their own biases and the structural barriers in trial design.

Key findings

01Patients reported fear of being treated as a 'guinea pig' and mistrust rooted in historical medical abuse, while clinicians often attributed non-participation to patient reluctance or lack of knowledge.

02Family members and carers were frequently influential in the decision to join or decline a trial, a factor often underappreciated by healthcare professionals.

03Healthcare professionals identified time constraints and lack of training as major barriers, noting that discussing trials took significantly longer than standard care and that cultural competency training was often inadequate or absent.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The included studies were almost exclusively from the United States, with only one from Singapore, limiting generalizability to other healthcare systems. The patient population was predominantly African American or Black women, with underrepresentation of men, Indigenous populations, and other ethnic groups. Healthcare professional participants were majority White, which may reflect a limited perspective on the biases experienced by minority patients. The review relies on qualitative data, so it identifies themes and perceptions but cannot quantify the magnitude of barriers or the effectiveness of interventions.

Declared interests

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the finding that clinicians blame 'patient reluctance' as evidence that patients are unwilling. The review shows this is often a misinterpretation of mistrust or structural barriers. Conversely, do not assume that 'race-neutral' approaches are effective; the review found that ignoring ethnicity can overlook specific cultural and historical factors driving non-participation.

Read it on PubMed →