Meta-AnalysisAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2025

The Association Between Maternal Asthma and Child Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Renee van der Schaaf, Vanessa E Murphy, Soriah Harvey and 3 others

PMID 40542518

WHAT IT FOUND

Children of mothers with asthma were about a third more likely to be autistic, pooled across 19 studies.

The studies cannot show asthma causes autism: none accounted for autism running in families, which may explain part of the link.

Key findings

01Pooled across 14 studies, children of mothers with any history of asthma had about a third higher odds of being autistic (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.44), with a high level of disagreement between the studies.

02Asthma that was current during the pregnancy itself was linked to a smaller rise in odds across 10 studies (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.35).

03Comparing only women who had asthma, those who used asthma medication in pregnancy were no more likely to have an autistic child than those who did not (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.27, two studies).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

None of the 19 studies accounted for autism running in families. Autism is highly heritable, so shared genes between mother and child could explain part of the link, and the authors say this means the effect reported here may be overestimated. Every included study was carried out in a wealthy western country with predominantly white participants, so the result may not apply to other populations. Several of the studies that found no link were too small to detect one, which pushes the pooled estimate toward a positive result. The medication analyses rested on only two to three studies with few participants, so they cannot settle whether asthma medication itself matters. Asthma severity, and whether the asthma was active or dormant during pregnancy, was mostly not recorded, and there was no information on dose, frequency or duration of medication. The authors say this stopped them separating the effect of the disease from the effect of its treatment. Studies used different ways of identifying asthma and autism, including self-report and diagnosis codes, and some had no case confirmation, which can misclassify people.

Declared interests

Three funders are named: an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship, Asthma Australia, and the Medical Research Future Fund. The authors declare no conflicts of interest and state they have nothing to report. The paper does not say whether any funder had a role in designing the study or writing it up.

The easy way to misread this

These pooled results do not mean asthma causes autism, or that controlling asthma during pregnancy would change a child's neurodevelopment. No included study accounted for autism running in families, and the authors state plainly that a causal relationship cannot be inferred; the medication comparisons rest on only two or three small studies.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
2,530,716 participants across 19 studies, including 73,065 autistic children
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

Browse

    Cite

    Renee van der Schaaf, Vanessa E Murphy, Soriah Harvey, et al. The Association Between Maternal Asthma and Child Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research. 2025.

    Read the original — we summarise, we never replace the paper.