PTMeta-AnalysisTrends in hearing2022

The Association between Hearing Impairment and Postural Stability in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jacinta I Foster, Katrina L Williams, Barbra H B Timmer and 1 others

PMID 36524292

WHAT IT FOUND

Older adults with moderate to severe hearing loss walk slower, take longer to stand up, and score lower on a standard mobility test than those with normal hearing.

Mild hearing loss showed a smaller effect, limited to walking speed.

Key findings

01In the meta-analysis, moderate to severe hearing impairment was associated with significantly longer 5x sit-to-stand time (mean difference 0.50 seconds), slower gait speed (mean difference 0.11 m/s), and lower SPPB scores (mean difference 0.79 points on a 12-point scale) compared to normal hearing.

02Mild hearing impairment showed no significant difference in sit-to-stand time or SPPB score compared to normal hearing, but did show significantly slower gait speed (mean difference 0.04 m/s).

03The review included 25 studies with 27,847 participants across 12 countries; 18 of the 25 were cross-sectional designs.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Most included studies (18 of 25) were cross-sectional, so the direction of the relationship cannot be established. Hearing loss and balance decline may both result from shared ageing processes. Heterogeneity was high for gait speed (I-squared 92 to 96%) and SPPB (I-squared 78 to 86%), partly because gait speed was measured over distances ranging from 2.4 m to 10 m and at different paces across studies. Hearing impairment was defined differently across studies: some used pure-tone average in the better ear, others in both ears, and one used a screening device that classified by worst ear. Three studies relied on self-report rather than audiometry. Participant ages varied by more than 15 years between studies, and recruitment methods differed (clinic patients, university pools, national samples). Only two of the 25 studies justified their sample size, and five used convenience sampling with different recruitment for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing groups.

Declared interests

The work was supported by Sonova AG (a hearing aid manufacturer) as part of a larger study series. The authors declared no conflicts of interest and stated that the sponsor was not involved in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or the decision to submit.

The easy way to misread this

This is an association, not a treatment effect. No study in the review tested whether treating hearing loss improves balance, and most designs are cross-sectional, so causation cannot be established. The mild hearing loss group showed no significant difference in sit-to-stand time or the overall mobility score, so do not assume the same degree of balance impairment across all hearing loss severities.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →