Ten-Year Update of Nurse Practitioner Service Impact on Patient and Health Service Outcomes in Emergency Care Settings-A Systematic Review.
Amanda Fox, Suzanne Williams, Natasha Jennings and 4 others
PMID 41808331WHAT IT FOUND
Emergency nurse practitioner services in emergency and urgent care showed mixed outcomes: some studies reported faster treatment and shorter stays, others found no difference or longer waits, and no included study measured cost.
Key findings
01No included study measured the cost or broader financial impact of emergency nurse practitioner services.
02Timeliness results were mixed: 49.2% of nurse practitioner patients received analgesia within 30 minutes versus 29.7% under standard care in one study, while another study found no significant difference in waiting times (mean 39.4 versus 41.5 minutes).
03Length of stay was shorter in one study (147 minutes versus 291 minutes in a nurse practitioner triage zone), but another study found no significant difference (mean 146.7 versus 143.5 minutes).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
No included study measured cost or economic impact, so the review cannot say whether nurse practitioner services save money. The 17 studies used different designs, settings, countries, and outcome definitions, which makes direct comparison difficult. Patient satisfaction was measured in only four studies and in different ways, including survey scores and comments in notes. Some length of stay and discharge findings did not account for patient severity or acuity, so lower admission rates may not be due only to nurse practitioner care. The review included only English full-text studies from settings with title-protected nurse practitioners, so results may not apply to other health systems or non-title-protected roles. Most studies were retrospective cohorts, so they can show associations rather than prove that nurse practitioner services caused the outcomes.
Declared interests
The authors report nothing to declare for funding and no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this review as proof that emergency nurse practitioner services save money or consistently reduce waiting time and length of stay. No included study measured cost, and waiting time and length of stay results were mixed. Some studies found no significant difference or longer waits.