"Tell Me What My Job Is": A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Autistic Academic Staff Working in Higher Education in Ireland.
Neil Kenny, Alison Doyle, Claire O'Neill and 4 others
PMID 42028804WHAT IT FOUND
Autistic academics described diagnosis as making sense of their working lives, but role ambiguity, implicit communication norms and constant availability drove masking, exhaustion and burnout.
Hyper-focus, pattern-spotting and structured teaching were named as strengths that only show when environments are predictable and accepting.
Key findings
01Diagnosis was described as a turning point: it made sense of why participants worked and communicated the way they did, and it removed the harsh labels they had been applying to themselves.
02Participants described academic roles as having unclear boundaries, leaving them unable to say what was expected of them or to ask for help; one summed it up as wanting someone to tell them what their job is.
03Masking against unpredictable workloads was tied to exhaustion and burnout; over-preparation and rigid routines were used as protection but added to the long-term toll.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Nothing was tested. These are accounts of what work is like, not an evaluation of any accommodation, training or support. The authors state the findings are not statistically generalisable, only transferable insights about how institutional environments shape inclusion and belonging. The 11 participants were people willing and able to take part in research, so autistic academics in more precarious posts are likely to be missing. Recruitment coincided with examination periods, which the authors say may have limited who responded. Everyone worked in Irish higher education, where supports for disabled and autistic staff are described as less developed than elsewhere, and policies vary between countries. Taking part required current employment and at least one semester of teaching, so people who left academia or never got in are absent.
Declared interests
Funded by a Dublin City University Collaborative Research Grant and a small research grant from the Dublin City University Institute of Education. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these accounts as evidence that any workplace change or support works. This study interviewed 11 autistic academics about their experiences and tested nothing, so the themes describe what people said, not what helps. It also cannot tell you about autistic people in other jobs, or about those in more precarious posts who were unlikely to take part.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →