PTRCTEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2024

Technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease patients with central obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

Jing-Jing Su, Arkers-Kwan-Ching Wong, Li-Ping Zhang and 4 others

PMID 38059577

WHAT IT FOUND

A nurse-led bundle of assessment, goal setting, physician-approved exercise, website feedback, pedometer tracking, and chatroom support improved physical activity and lifestyle, and reduced BMI and waist size, but not quality of life or mood.

Daily steps were not clearly higher at 12 weeks.

Key findings

01At 6 weeks, the intervention group had greater increases in daily steps (model β=2713.48, P=0.03) and greater reductions in weekly sitting minutes (model β=-665.17, P=0.002) than usual care.

02At 12 weeks, weekly sitting minutes (model β=-722.29, P=0.02) and total exercise (model β=-2445.99, P=0.008) still favoured the intervention group, while daily steps did not reach significance (model β=2450.70, P=0.08).

03At 12 weeks, health-promoting lifestyle improved (model β=15.50, P<0.001), but global quality of life did not improve (model β=0.38, P=0.20).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Single-site trial in one tertiary hospital in Wuhan, so results may not apply elsewhere. Participants had to read Chinese, have primary education or above, own an internet-connected device, and have no prescribed physical activity restriction. This may not apply elsewhere. Most participants were male (80.8%, N=63), so findings may not apply equally to women. The intervention was a bundle, so the effect of any single component cannot be separated. Four participants had no or minimal intervention use, which challenges cause and effect. Follow-up was only 12 weeks, so sustained effects are unknown. Website engagement was limited: 26 participants logged in, and only 17 uploaded goal attainment data. The primary daily step result was not significant at 12 weeks, although other physical activity measures were.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the website, pedometer, or chatroom alone caused the improvements. The intervention was a nurse-led bundle that also included assessment, goal setting, physician-approved exercise, website self-monitoring and learning, and chatroom support, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The control group also received pedometer training, so pedometer use alone was not the difference.

Read it on PubMed →