Suicide resilience, identity crisis and quality of life in burned adolescents.
Fateme Mohammadi, Khodayar Oshvandi, Seyed Reza Borzou and 6 others
PMID 35941757WHAT IT FOUND
Burned adolescents reported identity crisis, suicide resilience, and quality of life scores of 62.05, 81.69, and 52.17.
Identity crisis was linked to suicide resilience and quality of life. It is not evidence that treatment changed these outcomes.
Key findings
01Burned adolescents reported mean identity crisis score 62.05 ± 1.74, suicide resilience score 81.69 ± 1.31, and quality of life score 52.17 ± 1.28.
02Identity crisis was inversely correlated with suicide resilience (r = −.92, p < .001) and quality of life (r = −.87, p < .001), and suicide resilience was directly correlated with quality of life (r = .88, p < .001).
03Suicide resilience, being a child of a divorced family, cause of burns, extent of burn, financial situation, gender and age accounted for 68.74% of identity crisis variance in the regression model.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a cross-sectional self-report survey, so it cannot show that identity crisis causes changes in resilience or quality of life, or that any nursing action changes them. The authors invited 355 adolescents and 304 completed questionnaires, and they suggest non-return may have been due to weakness, fatigue and lethargy, so the sample may not represent all burned adolescents. Participants were Iranian adolescents aged 12 to 18 years who were at least 12 months after burn and had no other physical or mental disorders, so findings may not apply to younger children, other countries, or acute burn care. The text and Table 3 report different correlation values for some relationships, so the strength and direction of those associations are not fully clear. In the regression model, quality of life was removed because it was collinear with suicide resilience, so the model does not show separate effects of those two variables. The study did not test an intervention, so it cannot support a treatment effect.
Declared interests
The authors declared no competing interests. No funding source is stated in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the strong correlations as proof that improving suicide resilience or quality of life will reduce identity crisis. This was a self-report cross-sectional survey, and the regression model removed quality of life because it was collinear with suicide resilience, so the study cannot separate those contributions.