SurveyJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2019

Substance use among individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in residential care: Examining the relationship between drinking motives and substance use.

Esmée P Schijven, Robert Didden, Roy Otten and 1 others

PMID 30844128

WHAT IT FOUND

In residential care, many people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning used alcohol and drugs.

Drinking to cope or have fun, and to fit in, were linked to more severe use. Social motives were linked to more frequent use.

Key findings

01Participants commonly used substances: 62% currently used alcohol, 34% used cannabis and 20% used hard drugs, and 41% and 45% reached AUDIT and DUDIT cut-offs for problematic use.

02Higher social motives were linked to more frequent substance use, while higher conformity, coping and enhancement motives were linked to more severe alcohol use.

03For drug use, higher social motives were linked to more frequent cannabis and hard drug use, higher coping motives were linked to more severe use, and lower conformity motives were linked to more frequent cannabis use.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The analysed sample was 163 people, not all of the 204 approached in the first study; some did not return consent, were not eligible, or had never used alcohol or drugs. The sample was only people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning who lived in residential care and had behavioural problems, so it does not represent people with these conditions in the wider community. Substance use and motives were self-reported, and people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning may agree with answers or under-report sensitive topics. The AUDIT and DUDIT cut-offs were based on standards for people without mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning, so the number flagged as problematic may not be accurate for this group. The study measured links between motives and substance use, not whether one caused the other. Drug motive items were completed only by participants who used hard drugs, not by respondents who only used cannabis.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these motive links as proof that a motive-based intervention works. The study only measured links from self-report in people living in residential care.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
163 individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning who had used alcohol and/or drugs in the past
Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Esmée P Schijven, Robert Didden, Roy Otten, et al. Substance use among individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in residential care: Examining the relationship between drinking motives and substance use. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2019.

    Read the original