Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Åsa Andersén, Kjerstin Larsson, Per Lytsy and 3 others
PMID 29318421WHAT IT FOUND
Compared with usual transfer, multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation raised women's general self-efficacy from 2.29 to 2.74 on a 1 to 4 scale.
Acceptance and commitment therapy alone did not.
Key findings
01TEAM was associated with a 0.23 higher general self-efficacy score at 12 months on the 1 to 4 scale.
02ACT alone did not significantly improve general self-efficacy at 12 months compared with control.
03Higher self-efficacy before treatment was associated with higher self-efficacy at 12 months, with a reported coefficient of 0.68 on the 1 to 4 scale.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The outcome was general self-efficacy, not return to work or work-specific self-efficacy. The TEAM intervention was multimodal, including physician, occupational therapist, social worker, psychologist, later physiotherapist, individual plans, weekly meetings, cooperation with insurance and employment services, and ACT for many participants, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Self-efficacy and anxiety or depression were measured after randomisation, so group assignment may have influenced baseline scores. Follow-up missing data were substantial, and 52 participants were excluded from analyses based on imputed data. Non-responders at 12 months had lower baseline self-efficacy and higher anxiety and depression, which may bias results. Participants had been on sick leave for a mean of 7.8 years, so results may not apply to shorter sick leave periods. The TEAM assessment changed between phases, from occupational therapist, psychologist, social worker, and physician assessment to physiotherapist and physician assessment.
Declared interests
The study was funded by REHSAM. No other conflicts of interest are reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the self-efficacy gain as evidence that return to work improved. The study measured general self-efficacy only, not return to work or work-specific self-efficacy.