Stakeholder Perspectives on Facilitators of and Barriers to the Implementation of Internet of Things-Equipped Powered Wheelchairs in Sweden: Qualitative Case Study.
Johan Borg, Marie Elf, Anders Brantnell and 1 others
A qualitative case study of one Swedish center's rollout of IoT-monitored powered wheelchairs found that GDPR uncertainty and organizational coordination were the main barriers, not the technology itself.
It does not test whether the wheelchairs improve patient outcomes.
Key findings
1The regional application board initially rejected the IoT system because the data server was outside the EU and GPS data was classified as personal data; approval came only after the server was moved to Sweden, GPS was disabled, and two-factor authentication was added.
2The study explicitly did not include wheelchair users or frontline clinicians such as occupational therapists and physiotherapists; findings reflect only the perspective of those involved in planning, governance, and execution of the rollout.
3The authors conclude that implementation was a negotiated, iterative alignment of legal, organizational, technical, and relational factors rather than a single technical decision, and that no single factor was sufficient on its own.
to read the rest of this summary — three full summaries a month, no card.
Already have an account?
What it does not show
Single center in one Swedish county; the authors note that transferability to other health systems, countries, or regulatory environments may be limited. Only 6 participants, all directly involved in the implementation process; wheelchair users, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and policymakers were not interviewed, so the user-experience and clinical-integration perspectives are absent. Accounts are retrospective (interviews conducted 2024–2025 about events beginning in 2019–2023), introducing recall and social-desirability bias. GPT-5 was used to generate codes, themes, and subthemes; although the authors state they reviewed and refined the output, the degree of human oversight over the AI-generated structure is not fully transparent. The study describes one implementation with one supplier; the authors themselves note that regional variation and the limited number of suppliers constrain generalisability.
Declared interests
Funded by Vinnova, Sweden (grant 2021-04581). No conflicts of interest declared by the authors.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →