PTOtherGait & posture2019

Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities.

Enrica Papi, Anthony M J Bull, Alison H McGregor

PMID 30391750

WHAT IT FOUND

During walking, sit-to-stand, and lifting, adjacent spine segments did not move together in a predictable way in people with and without low back pain.

Do not assume upper and lower spine regions act as one.

Key findings

01Across 72 range-of-motion comparisons, only 2 showed strong to very strong coupling between adjacent spine segments, and 55 were weak to very weak.

02The coupling changed with the segment pair, the task, and whether the person had low back pain.

03During lifting, healthy controls showed strong upper and lower lumbar coupling while the low back pain group showed weak coupling.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included Forty volunteers, and the low back pain group had only minimal to moderate disability, so it may not reflect people with more severe pain. The low back pain group was 13 years older than the healthy group, so age may have influenced movement patterns. Skin movement over the spine may have changed the measured angles, although the authors note similar marker error would affect both groups. Only walking, sit-to-stand, and lifting were tested, so the findings may not apply to other activities. The authors used one classification rule for calling couplings weak or strong, and another rule could change the interpretation. They analysed four spine segments, not each vertebra, because motion capture and marker placement limit finer detail.

Declared interests

The authors declared nothing to declare.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that spinal segments never move together. Some adjacent segments were strongly correlated during particular tasks and planes; the finding is that the pattern is not predictable enough to assume redundancy.

Read it on PubMed →