Spectral Coefficient Analyses of Word-Initial Stop Consonant Productions Suggest Similar Anticipatory Coarticulation for Stuttering and Nonstuttering Adults.
Santosh Maruthy, Yongqiang Feng, Ludo Max
PMID 29280401WHAT IT FOUND
Fluent /t/ productions by adults who stutter and adults who do not showed the same vowel-related anticipatory coarticulation.
The upcoming vowel changed the consonant’s burst similarly in both groups, but stuttering status did not distinguish them.
Key findings
01The upcoming vowel affected the acoustic spectrum of the initial /t/ burst and aspiration in both groups, and the effect appeared as early as the consonant burst.
02There was no statistically significant main effect of stuttering group and no significant Group by Vowel or Group by Vowel by Window interaction.
03The stuttering group did not differ from the nonstuttering group in the detailed spectral characteristics of voiceless stop consonant production in general.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was small, with 8 adults who stutter and 8 adults who do not stutter, so a subtle group difference could have been missed. The study tested only fluent single-word productions of /t/ before three vowels, not dysfluent speech, other consonants, sentences, or narratives. The recordings were originally made for an auditory feedback study, and only baseline trials were analyzed. Two adults who stutter had one unilateral 4000 Hz hearing threshold at 40 dB HL, so hearing was not identical across all participants. Stuttering severity ranged from very mild to very severe, and the paper does not say whether severity affected the acoustic results. The researchers deliberately used a loose statistical cutoff to look for any stuttering versus nonstuttering difference, so positive vowel and window effects should be read with that choice in mind. No treatment was tested, so the study cannot support therapy efficacy.
Declared interests
The supplied publication types indicate NIH extramural and non-U.S. government research support. The supplied article text does not include an author conflict of interest statement.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that stuttering speech motor control is normal. The null result applies only to perceptually fluent /t/ productions before three vowels in single words by 8 adults who stutter, and it does not test dysfluent speech, other sounds, sentences, or therapy outcomes.