RNSurveyClinical nursing research2021

Sociodemographic Indicators of Social Position and Self-care Maintenance in Adults with Heart Failure.

Foster Osei Baah, Jesse Chittams, Beverly Carlson and 4 others

PMID 33605154

WHAT IT FOUND

In adults with chronic heart failure, race, education, and marital status were weakly linked to self-care maintenance scores.

Together they explained only 3.8% of score differences, so they are not strong predictors.

Key findings

01Race, education, and marital status were the best determinants of self-care maintenance in the final model, but the model explained only 3.8% of the variance in scores.

02In post hoc comparisons, Asian or mixed race participants scored higher than White participants, some college education scored higher than high school or less, and married or partnered participants scored higher than single participants.

03Age group, gender, income adequacy, and employment were removed from the model and were not related to self-care maintenance.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a secondary analysis of existing cross-sectional data collected for a different purpose, so it cannot show that sociodemographic factors cause poor self-care. The variables explained only 3.8% of the variance in self-care maintenance scores. The sample had few Asian or mixed-race participants, so these groups were combined and the analysis could not examine race in more detail. Self-care maintenance was measured by self-report questionnaire, not by observed behavior or clinical outcomes. 84 participants were excluded for missing key data, although excluded and included participants did not differ. Income adequacy was measured as perceived adequacy, not actual income, so it may not capture financial hardship. The model was built using a less strict p = .2 cutoff than the usual p = .05.

Declared interests

The paper is listed as NIH extramural research support. No author conflict-of-interest declaration is included in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat race, education, or marital status as reliable predictors of inadequate heart failure self-care. They explained only 3.8% of score differences, and the study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that these factors cause poor self-care.

Read it on PubMed →