OTCohortJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2022

Social Engagement and Distress Among Home Care Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Caitlin McArthur, Luke A Turcotte, Chi-Ling Joanna Sinn and 3 others

PMID 35577010

WHAT IT FOUND

Home care recipients in Ontario during the pandemic reported more distressing decline in social activities than before.

Older age, dementia, and more caregiver contact were linked to less distressing decline; social withdrawal showed a different pattern.

Key findings

01In adjusted models, pandemic was associated with higher odds of distressing social decline (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17), while the adjusted social withdrawal estimate was OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.74-1.00).

02Frailty, health instability, and depression were associated with higher odds of distressing social decline, while older age, functional impairment, and receiving informal or formal care were associated with lower odds.

03For distressing social decline, the pandemic interaction with dementia was associated with lower likelihood of reporting distressing decline, while the pandemic interaction with living alone was associated with higher likelihood.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is an observational cohort, so the associations do not prove that the pandemic, frailty, depression, living alone, or caregiver contact caused changes in social engagement or distress. The outcomes were assessor-judged categories based on self-report, caregiver report, provider information, and chart review, not outcomes from a tested intervention. Formal care was a combined measure of many services, so any association with formal care cannot be attributed to physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology and audiology, nursing, homemaking, or psychological therapy alone. Recipients with a Cognitive Performance Scale score of 4 or higher were excluded, so the findings may not apply to people who cannot reliably report distress. During the pandemic, assessments shifted to virtual methods and service volumes changed, so the study cannot separate real change in health or social status from prioritisation of more complex recipients. The supplied text reports higher proportions during the pandemic, but the counts and percentages shown for distressing social decline are inconsistent.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that receiving more formal care reduced social distress or withdrawal. Formal care was a combined measure that included personal support worker or home health aide, home nurse, homemaking services, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology and audiology services, and psychological therapy, so the study cannot separate the contribution of any one service.

Read it on PubMed →