Social-ecological barriers and facilitators to seeking inpatient psychiatric care among transgender and nonbinary people: A qualitative descriptive study.
Ava J Boutilier, Kristen D Clark, Jordon D Bosse and 3 others
PMID 39206720WHAT IT FOUND
Fifteen transgender and nonbinary adults described avoiding or delaying inpatient psychiatric care because they feared being called by the wrong name or pronouns, loss of autonomy, room assignments by birth sex, and hospital bills.
Allies, trusted clinicians, and nonprofit care helped them seek it.
Key findings
01Individual-level barriers included distrust of the mental health system, feeling unsafe, loss of autonomy, and minimizing one's own mental health needs, while accountability to family, friends, care professionals, or pets helped some seek care.
02Interpersonal barriers included lack of support for transgender and nonbinary identity and limited knowledge among mental healthcare professionals, while allyship helped patients navigate care.
03Structural barriers included the carceral feel of inpatient settings and financial costs, while nonprofit treatment options helped.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 15 English-speaking transgender and nonbinary adults in the United States were interviewed, so the themes may not apply to people outside that setting. The sample was mostly white and under 35, so older adults and people from racially and ethnically marginalized groups were not represented enough to examine intersecting stigma. Recruitment was through convenience sources, so people with very different experiences may not have been reached. The study is cross-sectional and qualitative, so it describes experiences and cannot show why someone did or did not seek care. Participants were asked about admissions in the past 5 years, and interviews happened during the COVID-19 pandemic, so pandemic-related barriers may not have been captured. Recall bias was possible because some participants had multiple admissions and could not separate events, and duration of hospitalization was not asked. Many participants were also sexual minorities but did not describe barriers related to sexual orientation, so those effects were not reported.
Declared interests
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. J.J. was supported by a research apprenticeship program at the University of New Hampshire's Hamel Center for Undergraduate Research, and JDB was supported by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Research under award K01AT012495. The authors said the content is their own and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that any policy or training improves psychiatric care outcomes. It reports 15 people's experiences, not tested interventions.