Self-Determination Theory and Preventive Medication Adherence: Motivational Considerations to Support Historically Marginalized Adolescents With Asthma.
Susan W Blaakman, Maria Fagnano, Belinda Borrelli and 2 others
PMID 35788313WHAT IT FOUND
In 260 adolescents with asthma, feeling that taking daily preventive medicine was personally valuable and feeling able to keep taking it were linked with more current adherence and plans to continue.
This does not show either cause better adherence.
Key findings
01Adolescents who reported taking their preventive asthma medicine almost every day or every day had higher autonomous motivation and perceived competence than adolescents who did not.
02Higher autonomous motivation and perceived competence were linked with adolescents reporting they took preventive medicine most or all days and planned to continue, and with lower reported likelihood of missing doses.
03Autonomous motivation and perceived competence were positively correlated with importance, desire, and confidence about taking medicine, and were higher in adolescents who reported they could follow their provider's plan.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was baseline cross-sectional survey data, so it cannot show that autonomous motivation or perceived competence caused better adherence. Adherence and motivation were self-reported, so responses may have been biased. The analysis included only adolescents who said they were taking preventive asthma medication at baseline, so it may not apply to teens not taking any preventive medication. The sample was urban and largely Black or Hispanic with public insurance, and the authors say it is unclear whether relationships persist in a less symptomatic or more diverse sample. The study did not assess relatedness, which the authors note may matter for adolescents managing asthma. The study tested associations, not an intervention, so it cannot show what clinicians should do to improve adherence.
Declared interests
The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that building autonomous motivation and perceived competence will improve asthma medication adherence. This was a cross-sectional self-report analysis, so it shows associations at one time point and cannot show that either factor causes better adherence.