Roles in Kayoino-ba and their relationship with Ikigai, functional ability, and frailty in older adults.
Mutsumi Nakamura, Shingo Nakai
PMID 41492259WHAT IT FOUND
Older adults who organised or ran community group activities scored higher on a purpose-in-life measure, moved faster, had stronger grip and were less often frail than those who only attended.
The study cannot tell whether the roles caused this.
Key findings
01Adjusted for age group, sex, frailty, participation frequency and years of participation, participants who held a role had higher odds of being classified as having Ikigai (odds ratio 7.140, 95% CI 1.12 to 45.52; p<0.05).
02The role group scored better than the no-role group on grip strength, Timed Up and Go, Ikigai-9, the Kihon Checklist and life space, but not on the five-times sit-to-stand test or 5-metre walking time. Grip strength averaged 29.1 kg with a role versus 21.9 kg without, and Ikigai-9 was 33.9 versus 29.6 on a scale of 9 to 45.
0380 of the 265 participants (30.2%) held a role and 185 (69.8%) only attended. The group without roles contained a higher proportion of frail members.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Everyone was measured on a single occasion, so the study shows that roles and better scores go together and says nothing about which came first. Healthier people may be the ones who take on roles. Only 20 of the 103 invited groups took part, everyone came from one city and had to consent, and the authors say this probably skews the sample towards people who already pay attention to their health. What counts as a role depends on the type of activity and how each group is run, and the study only counted roles held inside these groups, not roles people had elsewhere. Measurements were taken at each group's own venue, where flooring and footwear varied, so some differences between venues could come from how the tests were done rather than from the people themselves. Very few participants were actually frail (17 of 265), so the frailty comparison rests on small numbers.
Declared interests
Funded by special research grants from Tohto University and Shizuoka Sangyo University. The authors declare no conflicts of interest, and no company selling a treatment is named.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that giving an older adult a role in a community group will make them healthier. Everyone was measured at one point in time, so the study cannot tell whether the role came before the better function or the other way round. The adjusted odds ratio also ranged from 1.12 to 45.52, which is very imprecise.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →