PTSystematic ReviewInternational journal of sports physical therapy2024

Risk Factors Associated with First Time and Recurrent Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.

Alexis Wright, Brandon Ness, Angela Spontelli-Gisselman and 3 others

PMID 38707855

WHAT IT FOUND

Being male, playing sports like skiing, snowboarding, wrestling or football, being hypermobile, and having a taller, narrower shoulder socket were linked to a first shoulder dislocation.

Repeat dislocations were linked to being male, under 30, or prior instability with another injury. Study quality was mixed.

Key findings

01In every study that looked at sex, males were at greater risk of a first shoulder dislocation than females, and in five of the six studies that looked at sex, males were at greater risk of a recurrent dislocation.

02Skiing and snowboarding, wrestling and football were linked to a moderate to large risk of a first dislocation, while rugby, boxing, American football, lacrosse and Judo were linked to a smaller risk.

03Being under 30, and particularly under 20, carried the largest associations with recurrent dislocation.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Almost every included study was about dislocation or subluxation. Only two looked at less severe instability, so the review cannot say anything about the patients who feel loose or unstable without dislocating. The studies were too different from one another to combine, so there is no pooled estimate for any risk factor. Each finding rests on one study or a handful of studies. Quality was mixed. Five of the 39 studies scored under 5 out of 9, and some findings come from single studies, including one with only 45 people. Some of the strongest sport findings come from one military academy dataset in the United States. Fewer studies examined risk factors for females than for males. Three included studies did not separate first-time from recurrent instability. Odds ratios were missing from many studies and the authors could not calculate them all from the data given. The reference standard for diagnosing instability and the age norms differed from study to study.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in the creation of this manuscript. No other declaration appears in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat these risk factors as confirmed or use them to screen patients. Most associations come from only one or two studies, quality scores ranged from 2 to 9 out of 9, and the studies were too different to pool into a single estimate. Many of the factors, such as sex, age and the shape of the shoulder socket, cannot be changed anyway.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →