Systematic ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Risk Adjustment in Home and Community Based Services Outcome Measurement.

James Houseworth, Tina Kilaberia, Renata Ticha and 1 others

PMID 36188939

WHAT IT FOUND

Current research on home and community-based services rarely uses risk adjustment, relying mostly on demographics.

Experts recommend testing chronic conditions, functional disability, mental health and cognition as key factors to adjust for in future outcome studies.

Key findings

01Risk adjustment is not a common practice in home and community-based services outcome research, despite being standard in healthcare reimbursement.

02The most frequently used individual-level risk adjusters in reviewed studies were functional disability and chronic conditions, while demographic factors like age and sex were also common.

03The study recommends that future investigations test chronic conditions, functional disability, mental health and cognition as primary risk adjusters.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The search strategy may have missed relevant studies. The definition of a 'risk adjuster' versus a 'covariate' is not clearly established in this field, which may have affected how variables were categorized. The reviewed literature was dominated by studies focusing on health and functioning outcomes, meaning the recommendations may not fully apply to social or employment outcomes. The study focused only on individual-level factors and did not assess system-level factors like funding or policy.

Declared interests

The work was funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. The authors declared no commercial or financial conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the recommended risk adjusters as proven tools for evaluating your own clinic's outcomes. The authors state these factors need to be tested in future investigations, and current evidence shows that risk adjustment is not yet a standardized or common practice in home and community-based services research.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
29 studies
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

Browse

    Cite

    James Houseworth, Tina Kilaberia, Renata Ticha, et al. Risk Adjustment in Home and Community Based Services Outcome Measurement. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. 2022.

    Read the original