Return to Work Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A One-Year Prospective Cohort Study in Participants with Direct Referral from Hospital to Occupational Health Care Services.
Pauliina Kangas, Satu Soini, Konsta Pamilo and 2 others
PMID 38896401WHAT IT FOUND
In 209 workers after hip or knee arthroplasty, mean return to work was 68 days for hip and 87 days for knee.
The paper reports 33% and 25% shorter times than earlier cohorts, but the pathway combined several supports at once.
Key findings
01Among 209 analysed participants, mean time to return to work was 68 days after hip arthroplasty and 87 days after knee arthroplasty.
02The paper reports that mean time to return to work after hip or knee arthroplasty was 33% and 25% shorter than earlier Finnish cohort times after the coordinated pathway was implemented.
03Patient expectation about return-to-work time was the strongest factor associated with time to return to work, and sick leave during the six months before arthroplasty was the second strongest.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study compared outcomes with earlier Finnish cohorts rather than with a concurrent control group, so it cannot show that any single part of the coordinated pathway caused faster return to work. Return to work was self-reported, and vacation days may have been included between surgery and return. Baseline expectations were answered while participants were recovering in hospital, so pain or the surgery itself may have influenced those answers. Of the 266 participants who answered baseline, 57 did not answer follow-up. Those dropouts had higher physical workload, more sick leave before surgery, and expected longer sick leave, so the analysed group may have returned faster than the original eligible group. The study was done in Finland, where occupational health care is statutory for employees, so the pathway may not transfer to systems without that structure. The exact number of eligible patients with occupational health care entitlement was unknown, and the target group was estimated.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that referral to occupational health care alone caused faster return to work. The coordinated pathway also included information before surgery, surgeon-prescribed short sick leave, referral to occupational health care, individual work assessment, occupational physiotherapy guidance, medical or vocational rehabilitation, including physiotherapy, arthritis rehabilitation courses, and work trials, joint negotiation with the employer, workplace adjustments, and follow-up by occupational health specialists. The paper compared results with earlier Finnish cohorts rather than with a concurrent group.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →