PTOTMeta-AnalysisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Resistance Exercise Training on Musculoskeletal, Metabolic and Psychological Health in Sedentary Office Workers - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Baskaran Chandrasekaran, Kalyana Chakravarthy Bairapareddy, Chythra R Rao

PMID 39953203

WHAT IT FOUND

Resistance training improved neck and shoulder strength and reduced discomfort in office workers, but showed no significant benefit for metabolic or mental health outcomes.

The evidence quality is very low due to high bias and inconsistency, so these results are not yet reliable for clinical practice.

Key findings

01Resistance training significantly improved overall musculoskeletal strength, particularly in the neck and shoulder regions.

02Resistance training significantly reduced neck and shoulder discomfort, though the certainty of this evidence is very low.

03Resistance training did not significantly change metabolic risk factors such as BMI, waist-hip ratio, or systolic blood pressure.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The certainty of evidence was rated as very low for most outcomes due to high risk of bias in the included studies, such as lack of blinding and unclear randomization. There was substantial heterogeneity in the types of resistance training interventions, dosages, and outcome measures used across the 17 studies. Only a small number of studies were available for many specific outcomes, limiting the robustness of the pooled estimates. All included studies were conducted in high-income countries, which may limit the generalizability of findings to office workers in low- and middle-income settings. Some reported effect sizes, particularly for shoulder discomfort, appear implausibly large, suggesting potential issues with data extraction or measurement scales.

Declared interests

The study was funded by Manipal Academy of Higher Education. No other conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the large reported effect on shoulder discomfort as proof of efficacy. The certainty of evidence is very low, and the effect size is likely inflated by methodological flaws and heterogeneity in the included studies.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →