RNSystematic ReviewNursing open2024

Resilience in children of parents with mental illness, alcohol or substance misuse-An integrative review.

Mikael Gunnar Ahlborg, Jens Martin Nygren, Petra Svedberg and 1 others

PMID 38881475

WHAT IT FOUND

Children of parents with mental illness or substance misuse drew strength from active coping, supportive family members and trusted adults outside home, including online peers.

Nurses should ask about these resources, not only risk.

Key findings

01Resilience resources were grouped at three levels: the child, the family and supports outside the family.

02Children who used active or problem-solving coping reported fewer depressive symptoms, but this coping was used less often by children of parents with mental illness than by controls.

03Adolescents valued online peer support, and young people said professional help often came too late.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Resilience has no single definition, and the included studies measured it in different ways, so the findings are not directly comparable. The review included only 14 studies, with mixed qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method designs, and some had accepted quality. Most studies were from Western cultures, so transferability to other cultural settings is uncertain. Fewer included studies focused on parental substance misuse than on parental mental illness, so the evidence is uneven across parent conditions. One included study interviewed clinicians rather than children, so some descriptions are not child-reported. The review describes resources and associations reported in included studies; it does not prove that any resilience programme works.

Declared interests

This research was funded by Laholm municipality, grant number S2019/166. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders did not have any role in the study design, data collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as proof that active coping or a resilience programme prevents mental health problems. The included studies were heterogeneous, and the review reports what children and families described or measured, not a tested treatment effect.

Read it on PubMed →