PTOtherInternational journal of sports physical therapy2024

Reliability of an Instrumented Pressure Walkway for Measuring Walking and Running Characteristics in Young, Athletic Individuals.

Alyx Jorgensen, Matthew McManigal, Austin Post and 4 others

PMID 38576831

WHAT IT FOUND

Three one-way passes over a pressure walkway gave consistent walking and running measurements in 38 young, active adults; stride width was the least repeatable walking measure across days.

Key findings

01Three passes produced measurements that agreed closely with four or five passes for all walking and running variables.

02Walking measurements were generally repeatable across days, but stride width was the least consistent.

03Running measurements were repeatable across days, but stance time, swing time, and cadence were only moderately consistent.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only young, active adults aged 15 to 35 who had no recent lower-limb pain, injury, surgery, balance or neurological disorder, so it does not show how the walkway performs in older adults, sedentary people, or patients with gait problems. Only 21 participants completed the second test session, so the day-to-day repeatability findings rest on a smaller group than the single-session trial-count findings. The second visit happened between one and 14 days after the first, which may not match the interval a clinic would use for follow-up. The paper did not test whether the minimal change values correspond to clinically meaningful changes in walking or running. Single support and double support measures were not analyzed for running. The participants wore their own athletic shoes, and speed was self-selected, so the results may not apply to other footwear or fixed-speed testing.

Declared interests

No conflicts of interest were declared. The work was supported by the Nebraska Bankers Association and the University of Nebraska Medical Center; the funding sources had no involvement in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or submission for publication.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that three passes on this pressure walkway are enough for every patient or that its scores can detect clinically meaningful change in injured or older people. The study only tested young, active individuals without injury or impairment, and the authors say further work is needed to show whether the reported minimal change values match clinically meaningful gait changes.

Read it on PubMed →

Reliability of an Instrumented Pressure Walkway for Measuring Walking and Running Characteristics in Young, Athletic Individuals. — Applied Evidence