PTSystematic ReviewCardiopulmonary physical therapy journal2025

Rehabilitation for Physical Frailty in Lung Transplant Candidates: A Systematic Review.

Laura McGarrigle, Gill Norman, Helen Hurst and 2 others

PMID 40612917

WHAT IT FOUND

Exercise programs improved walking speed, sit-to-stand time, and strength in lung transplant candidates.

But 13 of 15 studies had no group that did not exercise, so we cannot separate the exercise effect from natural change. Certainty is very low.

Key findings

01Most studies reported improvements in frailty measures: 7 of 8 SPPB cohorts showed preoperative improvement, gait speed increased in all but one of 7 studies, and sit-to-stand time improved in 4 of 6 cohorts.

02All outcomes were rated very low to low certainty, downgraded for risk of bias, participant heterogeneity, and imprecision from small samples with wide confidence intervals.

03Secondary outcomes (postoperative hospital length of stay, quality of life) showed no significant improvements in the 3 studies that reported them.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Thirteen of the 15 studies were before-and-after designs with no group that did not exercise, so improvements cannot be attributed to the intervention rather than to time, disease progression, or concurrent treatments. Only one randomised trial was included, and it was retained for completeness because it had not reported frailty outcomes; it does not contribute to the frailty evidence. Interventions varied widely in content, dose, duration (4 to 12 weeks), and delivery mode, making it impossible to identify which components or doses are effective. Four of the 15 studies were available only as abstracts, limiting the depth of quality assessment and data extraction. Most studies used completed-case analysis rather than intention-to-treat, and attrition reasons (transplant, delisting, death, drop-out) were often unexplained. There is no agreed core outcome set for exercise studies in this population, so studies measured different frailty and surrogate measures, limiting comparability. Vote counting captures the direction of effect but not its magnitude or clinical importance.

Declared interests

Several authors held part-time positions or fellowships funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester. No industry body, device manufacturer, or treatment vendor funded, designed, or wrote the study. The authors state that the views expressed are their own and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the consistent improvements in walking speed and sit-to-stand time as proof that exercise reduces frailty in lung transplant candidates. Thirteen of the fifteen studies compared patients to themselves before and after exercise with no group that did not exercise, so the changes could reflect time, disease course, or other treatments. The outcomes that would matter most for a transplant decision (post-operative hospital stay, quality of life) showed no significant benefit in the three studies that measured them.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →