PTCase ReportInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Rehabilitation Following a Latarjet After a Failed Labral Repair in a Female Overhead Athlete: A Resident's Case Report.

Timothy Sieng, John Cicciaro, Jon Michelini and 2 others

PMID 40904714

WHAT IT FOUND

A Division 1 basketball player returned to full sport five months after a Latarjet procedure, following a 16-week rehabilitation protocol.

She achieved limb symmetry scores above 90% and reported feeling 93% of her pre-injury baseline. This single case describes one possible pathway, not a proven standard.

Key findings

01The subject returned to full basketball activities at five months post-operatively, which is earlier than the typical six to nine months seen after Bankart repairs.

02At discharge, the subject reported feeling 93% of her pre-injury baseline and showed significant improvements in pain, function, and disability scores that exceeded minimal clinically important differences.

03Strength and performance testing at 16 weeks showed the surgical limb outperformed the non-surgical limb in strength and endurance, with limb symmetry indices above 90% for all tests.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a single case report, so the outcomes cannot be generalized to other patients or athletes. The subject was a high-level Division 1 athlete, which may make her rehabilitation response and timeline different from recreational or lower-level athletes. The paper does not include long-term follow-up data beyond nine months, so the durability of the result is unknown. There was no control group, so it is impossible to know if the specific protocol steps were necessary or if a different approach would have yielded the same result. The authors note a lack of consensus in the literature for return-to-sport criteria, meaning the thresholds used here are based on existing studies but are not universally agreed upon.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The case was completed during a residency program at the University of Florida Health.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this five-month return-to-sport timeline is standard or safe for all Latarjet patients. This is one athlete's response to one protocol, and the paper explicitly states there is no consensus on return-to-sport criteria for this population.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →